PoliticsJan 26, 2018
IBM👁🐝Ⓜ️

Tax cut has already increased revenue

https://www.axios.com/tim-cook-the-tax-plan-is-1516307596-0dfa1de4-c2d8-46a0-bff9-4d5052115887.html?source=sidebar That’s 38 billion in tax revenue from just one company. That’s more than enough to build a wall. Not to mention an additional 20,000 new jobs. How could anyone call his “trickle” down?

Tim Cook: Apple investing billions in U.S. thanks to tax cuts
Tim Cook: Apple investing billions in U.S. thanks to tax cuts
Axios
Oracle Rmbgrmbg Jan 26, 2018

Tax cuts are going to add 1.5 trillion dollars plus 300 billion in interest payments to the US' deficit. The hope is that the added income to families will help stimulate the economy enough to make up for this deficit. Citing one example of a company, that is under no legal obligation to deliver on its promises, as the success of tax cuts is plain stupid. Read up on deficit projections, national debt increase to understand the real impact of a tax cut.

IBM 👁🐝Ⓜ️ OP Jan 26, 2018

According to the CBO. But they haven’t been able to accurately predict the financial ramifications of any bill it has ever evaluated. Not even close. No better than throwing darts. https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2017/07/18/cbo-budget-projections-after-two-years-no-better-than-throwing-darts/#6762349867a2

Wells Fargo 9ej3n4 Jan 26, 2018

What are you talking about? That's literally trickle down in effect. I'm still skeptical of trickle down being THAT effective, but obviously we see some benefit. But at what cost?

IBM 👁🐝Ⓜ️ OP Jan 26, 2018

I’m fully aware of what trickle down means. Sorry if my sarcasm wasn’t obvious. “Trickle down” is a term made up by liberals. The implication is that very little “trickles” down to lower income folks when you cut taxes for the rich. Hence the sarcasm. 38 billion + 20,000 high paying jobs (and the added tax revenue from said jobs) is not trickle down. It’s flooding down. But what do you mean by “at what cost?” Apple would never had repatriated 200+ billion if it meant paying 88 billion in taxes under the old tax plan. 20% of 200 billion is more than 44% of 0

Wells Fargo 9ej3n4 Jan 26, 2018

See deficit comments above. As far as the effect, let's measure that by wage increases over the next several years and see how that plays out. If we see wage growth outpace inflation at a healthier clip, then I may start to feel more confident in trickle down.

Expedia 🍺 beer Jan 26, 2018

How? Apple barely pays any taxes as it is

IBM 👁🐝Ⓜ️ OP Jan 26, 2018

Exactly. The rate is too high right now for them to repatriate 200 billion from offshore holdings. 0 x 44% = 0 But since the rate is now much lower they are willing to repatriate that cash and invest in country. The 38 billion is just an instant cherry on top.

Expedia 🍺 beer Jan 26, 2018

I’ll see it then I’ll believe it.

Accenture RimRax Jan 26, 2018

As someone who didn’t vote for Trump, I have to admit, I’m pleasantly surprised at how well the economy’s doing. Gotta give credit where credit is due.

Oracle buck 99 Jan 26, 2018

Some presidents are grinders, others are rainmakers. Trump is a rainmaker.

Apple 🥓+🍎=👍 Jan 26, 2018

Oh just wait. Reagan had the same glowing praise before being forced to raise taxes multiple times. Powder the ball sacks while you can fellas. This ARM blows up in 10 years guaranteed. If not sooner.

Amazon RyKt65 Jan 28, 2018

OP doesn't know the difference between tax revenue and corporate assets

IBM 👁🐝Ⓜ️ OP Jan 28, 2018

How stupid are you? Do you not know that the tax bill that was passed also deals with corporate tax? You know what repatriation is? I’ll let you click on the link I posted (or you could google the Apple announcement yourself).

Amazon RyKt65 Jan 28, 2018

No tax is payable on repatriated funds. Tax is payed on income, not assets. Stop calling other people stupid when you are ignorant.